{"id":101213,"date":"2016-09-20T15:34:35","date_gmt":"2016-09-20T15:34:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/gerdtestpress.online\/?guid=514e24582ab8defb470baf89ba627d93"},"modified":"2016-09-20T15:34:35","modified_gmt":"2016-09-20T15:34:35","slug":"do-no-harm-dont-discriminate-official-guidance-issued-on-robot-ethics-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/futuristgerd.com\/de\/2016\/09\/do-no-harm-dont-discriminate-official-guidance-issued-on-robot-ethics-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Nicht schaden, nicht diskriminieren: Offizieller Leitfaden zur Roboterethik ver\u00f6ffentlicht (via The Guardian)"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"posthaven-post-body\">\n<div>\u201cNow the British Standards Institute has issued a more official version aimed at helping designers create ethically sound robots.\u00a0The document, BS8611 Robots and robotic devices, is written in the dry language of a health and safety manual, but the undesirable scenarios it highlights could be taken directly from fiction. Robot deception, robot addiction and the possibility of self-learning systems exceeding their remits are all noted as hazards that manufacturers should consider.<\/p>\n<p>Welcoming the guidelines at the Social Robotics and AI conference in Oxford, Alan Winfield, a professor of robotics at the University of the West of England, said they represented \u201cthe first step towards embedding ethical values into robotics and AI\u201d.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Do no harm, don't discriminate: official guidance issued on robot ethics<br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/technology\/2016\/sep\/18\/official-guidance-robot-ethics-british-standards-institute\">https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/technology\/2016\/sep\/18\/official-guidance-robot-ethics-british-standards-institute<\/a><br \/>\nvia Instapaper<\/div>\n<div>\n<div>\n<div id=\"posthaven_gallery[1097652]\" class=\"posthaven-gallery\">\n<p class=\"posthaven-file posthaven-file-image posthaven-file-state-processed\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"posthaven-gallery-image\" src=\"https:\/\/phaven-prod.s3.amazonaws.com\/files\/image_part\/asset\/1772381\/yISw2IiOrE8hJjxw1dwkm7J1WSc\/medium_image1.PNG\" \/><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<div>\n<div>\"Jetzt hat das British Standards Institute eine offiziellere Version herausgegeben, die den Konstrukteuren helfen soll, ethisch einwandfreie Roboter zu entwickeln.<\/p>\n<p>Das Dokument BS8611 Robots and robotic devices (Roboter und Roboterger\u00e4te) ist in der trockenen Sprache eines Gesundheits- und Sicherheitshandbuchs verfasst, doch die darin aufgezeigten unerw\u00fcnschten Szenarien k\u00f6nnten direkt aus der Fiktion stammen. T\u00e4uschungsman\u00f6ver von Robotern, Robotersucht und die M\u00f6glichkeit, dass selbstlernende Systeme ihre Grenzen \u00fcberschreiten, werden als Gefahren genannt, die Hersteller ber\u00fccksichtigen sollten.<\/p>\n<p>Alan Winfield, Professor f\u00fcr Robotik an der University of the West of England, begr\u00fc\u00dfte die Leitlinien auf der Konferenz f\u00fcr soziale Robotik und KI in Oxford und sagte, sie seien \"der erste Schritt, um ethische Werte in der Robotik und KI zu verankern\".<\/p>\n<p>Nicht schaden, nicht diskriminieren: offizieller Leitfaden zur Roboterethik ver\u00f6ffentlicht<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/technology\/2016\/sep\/18\/official-guidance-robot-ethics-british-standards-institute\">https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/technology\/2016\/sep\/18\/official-guidance-robot-ethics-british-standards-institute<\/a><br \/>\u00fcber Instapaper<\/div>\n<div>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<div>\n<p>\n          <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/phaven-prod.s3.amazonaws.com\/files\/image_part\/asset\/1772381\/yISw2IiOrE8hJjxw1dwkm7J1WSc\/medium_image1.PNG\"><\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"author":38,"featured_media":101281,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_analytify_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1116],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-101213","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-digital-ethics","masonry-post","generate-columns","tablet-grid-50","mobile-grid-100","grid-parent","grid-33"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/futuristgerd.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/101213","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/futuristgerd.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/futuristgerd.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futuristgerd.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/38"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futuristgerd.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=101213"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/futuristgerd.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/101213\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futuristgerd.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/101281"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/futuristgerd.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=101213"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futuristgerd.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=101213"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futuristgerd.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=101213"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}