{"id":105487,"date":"2017-10-07T14:30:54","date_gmt":"2017-10-07T14:30:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/gerdtestpress.online\/?guid=b2ddd6086001f05e80234ba17ae449bd"},"modified":"2017-10-07T14:30:54","modified_gmt":"2017-10-07T14:30:54","slug":"rise-of-the-robolawyers-made-me-think-via-theatlantic","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/futuristgerd.com\/de\/2017\/10\/rise-of-the-robolawyers-made-me-think-via-theatlantic\/","title":{"rendered":"Rise of the Robolawyers: hat mich zum Nachdenken gebracht (via TheAtlantic)"},"content":{"rendered":"

 <\/p>\n

\n
\u00e2\u20ac\u0153DoNotPay is just the beginning. Until we see a major, society-changing breakthrough in artificial intelligence, robolawyers won\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t dispute the finer points of copyright law or write elegant legal briefs. But chatbots could be very useful in certain types of law. Deportation, bankruptcy, and divorce disputes, for instance, typically require navigating lengthy and confusing statutes that have been interpreted in thousands of previous decisions. Chatbots could eventually analyze most every possible exception, loophole, and historical case to determine the best path forward.<\/p>\n

As AI develops, robolawyers could help address the vast unmet legal needs of the poor. Roland Vogl, the executive director of the Stanford Program in Law, Science, and Technology, says bots will become the main entry point into the legal system. \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Every legal-aid group has to turn people away because there isn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t time to process all of the cases,\u00e2\u20ac\ufffd he says. \u00e2\u20ac\u0153We\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ll see cases that get navigated through an artificially intelligent computer system, and lawyers will only get involved when it\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s really necessary.\u00e2\u20ac\ufffd A good analogy is TurboTax: If your taxes are straightforward, you use TurboTax; if they\u00e2\u20ac\u2122re not, you get an accountant. The same will happen with law.\u00e2\u20ac\ufffd<\/p>\n

Rise of the Robolawyers
\nhttps:\/\/www.theatlantic.com\/magazine\/archive\/2017\/04\/rise-of-the-robolawyers\/517794\/<\/a>
\nvia Instapaper<\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\n
\u00e2\u20ac\u017eDoNotPay ist erst der Anfang. Bis wir einen gro\u00c3\u0178en, gesellschaftsver\u00c3?ndernden Durchbruch in der k\u00c3?nstlichen Intelligenz erleben, werden Roboteranw\u00c3?lte nicht die Feinheiten des Urheberrechts diskutieren oder elegante Schrifts\u00c3?tze schreiben. Aber Chatbots k\u00f6nnten in bestimmten Rechtsbereichen sehr n\u00fctzlich sein. Bei Abschiebungs-, Konkurs- und Scheidungsstreitigkeiten beispielsweise muss man sich in der Regel mit langen und verwirrenden Gesetzen auseinandersetzen, die bereits in Tausenden von Urteilen ausgelegt wurden. Chatbots k\u00f6nnten schlie\u00dflich fast jede m\u00f6gliche Ausnahme, jedes Schlupfloch und jeden historischen Fall analysieren, um den besten Weg zu finden.<\/p>\n

Mit der Weiterentwicklung der k\u00fcnstlichen Intelligenz k\u00f6nnten Robo-Anw\u00e4lte dazu beitragen, die gro\u00dfen ungedeckten rechtlichen Bed\u00fcrfnisse der Armen zu befriedigen. Roland Vogl, der gesch\u00e4ftsf\u00fchrende Direktor des Stanford-Programms f\u00fcr Recht, Wissenschaft und Technologie, ist der Meinung, dass Bots der Haupteinstiegspunkt in das Rechtssystem sein werden. \u00e2\u20ac\u017eJede Rechtshilfegruppe muss Menschen abweisen, weil sie keine Zeit hat, alle F\u00e4lle zu bearbeiten\u00e2\u20ac\u0153, sagt er. \u00e2\u20ac\u017eF\u00c3?lle werden durch ein k\u00c3?nstlich intelligentes Computersystem geleitet, und Anw\u00c3?lte werden nur dann eingeschaltet, wenn es wirklich notwendig ist.\u00e2\u20ac\u0153 Eine gute Analogie ist TurboTax: Wenn Ihre Steuern einfach sind, benutzen Sie TurboTax; wenn nicht, gehen Sie zu einem Buchhalter. Das Gleiche wird mit dem Recht passieren.\u00e2\u20ac\ufffd<\/p>\n

Der Aufstieg der Robolawyers
https:\/\/www.theatlantic.com\/magazine\/archive\/2017\/04\/rise-of-the-robolawyers\/517794\/<\/a>
\u00fcber Instapaper<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n

\n <\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"author":38,"featured_media":105312,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_analytify_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1116],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-105487","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-digital-ethics","masonry-post","generate-columns","tablet-grid-50","mobile-grid-100","grid-parent","grid-33"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/futuristgerd.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/105487","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/futuristgerd.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/futuristgerd.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futuristgerd.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/38"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futuristgerd.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=105487"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/futuristgerd.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/105487\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futuristgerd.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/105312"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/futuristgerd.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=105487"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futuristgerd.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=105487"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futuristgerd.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=105487"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}