{"id":87156,"date":"2016-03-05T22:28:48","date_gmt":"2016-03-05T21:28:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/gerdtestpress.online\/?guid=89b4086cf3b3540863ff3142b3dca3b5"},"modified":"2016-03-05T22:28:48","modified_gmt":"2016-03-05T21:28:48","slug":"forget-apples-fight-with-the-fbi-our-privacy-catastrophe-has-only-just-begun-cory-doctorow","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/futuristgerd.com\/es\/2016\/03\/forget-apples-fight-with-the-fbi-our-privacy-catastrophe-has-only-just-begun-cory-doctorow\/","title":{"rendered":"Olvida la lucha de Apple con el FBI: nuestra cat\u00e1strofe de privacidad no ha hecho m\u00e1s que empezar (Cory Doctorow)"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
Cory Doctorow nails it — I couldn't agree more !<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n

‘Painting the pro-privacy side as out-of-step loonies, tinfoil-hatted throwbacks in the post-privacy era was a cheap and effective tactic. It made the pro-surveillance argument into a *pro-progress* one: \u201cSociety has moved on. Our data can do more good in big, aggregated piles than it can in atomized fragments on your device and mine. The private data we exhaust when we move through the digital world is a precious resource, not pollution.\u201d<\/p>\n

\n
It\u2019s a powerful argument. When companies that promise to monetize your surveillance beat companies that promise to protect your privacy, when people can\u2019t even be bothered to tick the box to block tracking cookies, let alone install full-disk encryption and GPG to protect their email, the pro-surveillance camp can always argue that they\u2019re doing something that no one minds very much.\u201d<\/p>\n

Like climate change, the privacy catastrophes of the next two decades are already inevitable. The problem we face is preventing the\u00a0much worse<\/em>\u00a0catastrophes of the following the decades.\u00a0<\/p>\n

And as computers are integrated into the buildings and vehicles and cities we inhabit, as they penetrate our bodies, the potential harms from breaches will become worse”<\/p>\n

Forget Apple's fight with the FBI \u2013 our privacy catastrophe has only just begun
https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/technology\/2016\/mar\/04\/privacy-apple-fbi-encryption-surveillance<\/a>
via Instapaper<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\n
\n

\n \n <\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\n
Cory Doctorow lo ha clavado: \u00a1no podr\u00eda estar m\u00e1s de acuerdo!<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n

Pintar a los partidarios de la privacidad como chiflados fuera de lugar, retrocediendo a la era posterior a la privacidad, fue una t\u00e1ctica barata y eficaz. Convirti\u00f3 el argumento a favor de la vigilancia en un argumento *a favor del progreso*: \"La sociedad ha avanzado. Nuestros datos pueden hacer m\u00e1s bien en grandes pilas agregadas que en fragmentos atomizados en tu dispositivo y en el m\u00edo. Los datos privados que agotamos cuando nos movemos por el mundo digital son un recurso precioso, no una contaminaci\u00f3n\".<\/p>\n

\n
Es un argumento poderoso. Cuando las empresas que prometen monetizar su vigilancia superan a las que prometen proteger su privacidad, cuando la gente ni siquiera se molesta en marcar la casilla para bloquear las cookies de seguimiento, por no hablar de instalar el cifrado de disco completo y GPG para proteger su correo electr\u00f3nico, el bando a favor de la vigilancia siempre puede argumentar que est\u00e1n haciendo algo que a nadie le importa demasiado.\"<\/p>\n

Al igual que el cambio clim\u00e1tico, las cat\u00e1strofes de la privacidad de las pr\u00f3ximas dos d\u00e9cadas son ya inevitables. El problema al que nos enfrentamos es evitar que mucho peor<\/em> cat\u00e1strofes de las d\u00e9cadas siguientes. <\/p>\n

Y a medida que los ordenadores se integren en los edificios, veh\u00edculos y ciudades que habitamos, a medida que penetren en nuestros cuerpos, los da\u00f1os potenciales de las brechas se agravar\u00e1n\".<\/p>\n

Olvida la lucha de Apple con el FBI: nuestra cat\u00e1strofe de privacidad no ha hecho m\u00e1s que empezar
https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/technology\/2016\/mar\/04\/privacy-apple-fbi-encryption-surveillance<\/a>
v\u00eda Instapaper<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\n
\n

\n <\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"author":38,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_analytify_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1116],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-87156","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-digital-ethics","masonry-post","generate-columns","tablet-grid-50","mobile-grid-100","grid-parent","grid-33"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/futuristgerd.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87156","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/futuristgerd.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/futuristgerd.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futuristgerd.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/38"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futuristgerd.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=87156"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/futuristgerd.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87156\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/futuristgerd.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=87156"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futuristgerd.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=87156"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futuristgerd.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=87156"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}