{"id":87156,"date":"2016-03-05T22:28:48","date_gmt":"2016-03-05T21:28:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/gerdtestpress.online\/?guid=89b4086cf3b3540863ff3142b3dca3b5"},"modified":"2016-03-05T22:28:48","modified_gmt":"2016-03-05T21:28:48","slug":"forget-apples-fight-with-the-fbi-our-privacy-catastrophe-has-only-just-begun-cory-doctorow","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/futuristgerd.com\/pt\/2016\/03\/forget-apples-fight-with-the-fbi-our-privacy-catastrophe-has-only-just-begun-cory-doctorow\/","title":{"rendered":"Esque\u00e7a a luta da Apple com o FBI - a cat\u00e1strofe da nossa privacidade ainda agora come\u00e7ou (Cory Doctorow)"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
Cory Doctorow nails it — I couldn't agree more !<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n

‘Painting the pro-privacy side as out-of-step loonies, tinfoil-hatted throwbacks in the post-privacy era was a cheap and effective tactic. It made the pro-surveillance argument into a *pro-progress* one: \u201cSociety has moved on. Our data can do more good in big, aggregated piles than it can in atomized fragments on your device and mine. The private data we exhaust when we move through the digital world is a precious resource, not pollution.\u201d<\/p>\n

\n
It\u2019s a powerful argument. When companies that promise to monetize your surveillance beat companies that promise to protect your privacy, when people can\u2019t even be bothered to tick the box to block tracking cookies, let alone install full-disk encryption and GPG to protect their email, the pro-surveillance camp can always argue that they\u2019re doing something that no one minds very much.\u201d<\/p>\n

Like climate change, the privacy catastrophes of the next two decades are already inevitable. The problem we face is preventing the\u00a0much worse<\/em>\u00a0catastrophes of the following the decades.\u00a0<\/p>\n

And as computers are integrated into the buildings and vehicles and cities we inhabit, as they penetrate our bodies, the potential harms from breaches will become worse”<\/p>\n

Forget Apple's fight with the FBI \u2013 our privacy catastrophe has only just begun
https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/technology\/2016\/mar\/04\/privacy-apple-fbi-encryption-surveillance<\/a>
via Instapaper<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\n
\n

\n \n <\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\n
Cory Doctorow acerta em cheio - n\u00e3o podia estar mais de acordo!<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n

Pintar os defensores da privacidade como malucos fora de moda, retr\u00f3grados com chap\u00e9us de alum\u00ednio na era p\u00f3s-privacidade foi uma t\u00e1tica barata e eficaz. Transformou o argumento pr\u00f3-vigil\u00e2ncia num argumento *progresso*: \"A sociedade avan\u00e7ou. Os nossos dados podem fazer mais bem em pilhas grandes e agregadas do que em fragmentos atomizados no seu dispositivo e no meu. Os dados privados que esgotamos quando nos movemos no mundo digital s\u00e3o um recurso precioso, n\u00e3o polui\u00e7\u00e3o\".<\/p>\n

\n
\u00c9 um argumento poderoso. Quando as empresas que prometem rentabilizar a sua vigil\u00e2ncia batem as empresas que prometem proteger a sua privacidade, quando as pessoas nem sequer se d\u00e3o ao trabalho de assinalar a caixa para bloquear os cookies de rastreio, quanto mais instalar a encripta\u00e7\u00e3o total do disco e o GPG para proteger o seu correio eletr\u00f3nico, o campo pr\u00f3-vigil\u00e2ncia pode sempre argumentar que est\u00e1 a fazer algo que ningu\u00e9m se importa muito.\"<\/p>\n

Tal como as altera\u00e7\u00f5es clim\u00e1ticas, as cat\u00e1strofes da privacidade das pr\u00f3ximas duas d\u00e9cadas s\u00e3o j\u00e1 inevit\u00e1veis. O problema que enfrentamos \u00e9 impedir que as muito pior<\/em> cat\u00e1strofes das d\u00e9cadas seguintes. <\/p>\n

E \u00e0 medida que os computadores s\u00e3o integrados nos edif\u00edcios, nos ve\u00edculos e nas cidades que habitamos, \u00e0 medida que penetram no nosso corpo, os potenciais danos causados por viola\u00e7\u00f5es ser\u00e3o cada vez maiores\"<\/p>\n

Esque\u00e7a a luta da Apple com o FBI - a cat\u00e1strofe da nossa privacidade ainda agora come\u00e7ou
https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/technology\/2016\/mar\/04\/privacy-apple-fbi-encryption-surveillance<\/a>
via Instapaper<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\n
\n

\n <\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"author":38,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_analytify_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1116],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-87156","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-digital-ethics","masonry-post","generate-columns","tablet-grid-50","mobile-grid-100","grid-parent","grid-33"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/futuristgerd.com\/pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87156","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/futuristgerd.com\/pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/futuristgerd.com\/pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futuristgerd.com\/pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/38"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futuristgerd.com\/pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=87156"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/futuristgerd.com\/pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87156\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/futuristgerd.com\/pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=87156"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futuristgerd.com\/pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=87156"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futuristgerd.com\/pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=87156"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}